We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Tags:
Anyone else have an opinion?
Both are shown at Andy Peters David Bowie Autograph site in the Bowie Autograph Gallery as authentic 1973 signatures.
The first example posted does not have the expected appearance of 50 year old ink to say the very least. All look...unbelievably fresh.
Very interesting. It is amazing then that they are all in the same exceptional condition, showing no age and fresh ink.
Have you seen this thread?
I'm not an expert on David Bowie, but something here looks very off.
The 'D' looks as if the person signing this slowed down and his hand was shaking, while 'Bowie' looks absolutely fluent. The flows look different - slowed down vs fluent.
If it was signed by David Bowie, I'd expect the whole signature to have only one flow overall.
It also looks super new. Like, too new in my opinion.
I'd say that in my opinion, this signature is not genuine.
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on October 30, 2024 at 3:13pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service