Tags: CRCollection_Store
Ah, so you cannot address the Orson Welles signature which was "the worst you had ever seen"? Right, so just ignore the subject and start making wild accusations. And tell me, how does the price of what I'm selling have to do with it's authenticity? With regards to the Bowie items, I go by the market in the UK, not the US where his prices are inflated. So, don't get off subject. Address an issue you have with the signatures.
No, I simply won't allow you to change the subject. I just posted some Bowie. I don't think words are needed.
Worse than this one?
Are you serious? So, because the David Bowie signature on the program does not look like the one you provided, it's fake? It is doubtful that David Bowie ever signed the same way twice, so give me a break with that! Then there's the fact that they are signed with different ink pens, on different surfaces. Secondly, the program contains an inscription which matches David Bowie's handwriting perfectly (and yes, I found the same inscription in the exact handwriting). Not to mention there are 6 or 7 other signatures on the program which someone would have to "fake" (and why?). The Bowie signature has style, flow, spontaneity, and conviction. IT IS HIS SIGNATURE!!! If you choose to deny this, you are lying to yourself. Because everything about this piece says AUTHENTIC!
Keep posting all the Bowie signatures you like. This program was signed in a very relaxed setting, which is why it has the multiple signatures (all very legible, not rushed or scribbled). Most of what David Bowie signed was rushed, which are like the examples you are posting, this one was not.
It is not Bowie's hand. Nor is that Sinatra's, ABBA's, Waters, Welles etc.
Is the Orson Welles I provided fake? You know it's not! And it is spot on with the signed program. Now, go ahead and explain how someone wrote Orson Welles signature (all in one stroke, without stopping) to match a known example from the same time period perfectly. Go ahead Eric, we will be waiting.
Ah, what you mean is, you can't address the issue! So you post something completely irrelevant. Nice work!
As I said earlier, I will not change the subject for the reasons stated.
"Because everything about this piece says AUTHENTIC! " - John Freerman
What, exactly?
© 2025 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service