This one is likely to lead potential buyers astray as the setting and supporting letter is convincing on the surface. However, the signature is way off in my opinion, not least that Jim appears to have forgotten how to spell his surname, or the “i” has dropped off the page. I wonder however if the Sugarman letter is real and he unwittingly gave credence to something he genuinely believed to be the real deal, or that the letter is a fake? The only other option would be that he knowingly lent support to a fake signature. It is listed on eBay for the curious.
Tags:
The signature looks bad to me too. I’m not sure about the Sugerman letter.
Thanks Mark.
The signature isn't great, and here's my bigger concern. WHY, would somebody have THAT signed? If you're going to have Jim sign something back then -- it would be a photo, album, 45, or a piece of paper.
It’s a strange offering all round
The sig. is not in Jim's hand and is clearly a forgery in my opinion. I believe all of it is rubbish, unfortunately...
Thanks Jack. That discussion escaped regarding this seller. 👍🏻
As an eBay Partner Network Affiliate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
© 2026 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service