Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on December 24, 2012 at 4:46am

Any help in showing these without the links would be great.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 24, 2012 at 10:31am

Very nice!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on December 24, 2012 at 10:35am

Do you think they are 100% ok?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 24, 2012 at 10:38am

They definitely look authentic to me, but wait for some more opinions.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on December 24, 2012 at 10:44am

Many thanks. Seller's Mum also got these ones as well.

http://i1139.photobucket.com/albums/n549/paulgjohnston/photo_zps294...

http://i1139.photobucket.com/albums/n549/paulgjohnston/Ringo2_zpseb...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 24, 2012 at 10:53am

I'm not familiar with the autographs of Gerry and the Pacemakers, but that Ringo looks good to me too.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on December 24, 2012 at 10:55am

Many thanks again, appreciate the comments. Look forward to others as well.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on December 24, 2012 at 7:55pm

the McCartney really bothers me.  it has an extra loop in the McC area that I have never seen before.  and normally the "t" is the highest point in his last name.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 24, 2012 at 9:43pm

That's true about the "T", but it appears that he was running out of space and readjusted the size of the remaining portion of the signature.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Phillip H. on December 25, 2012 at 9:42am

All three look authentic to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on December 25, 2012 at 10:19am

Sent them via e mail to Perry Cox who reckoned they are good. Assume his word is good?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Xperttexpert on December 25, 2012 at 3:28pm

i think all are real

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page