Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Rich on January 21, 2013 at 9:54am

I honestly can't comment on the signatures themselves, since I really know close to nothing of Bowie, Simon and Garfunkel and Aerosmith.   If they were from the same sellers selling the Springsteen and U2 forgeries that melodiia and his cronies have sold, that could be trouble.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Arvind Mohindra on January 21, 2013 at 9:57am

noted with thanks!!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Carl Ryan on January 21, 2013 at 11:41am

All of these look bad as well. The Brad Whitford and Joe Perry immediately stood out to me. And all were signed in the same hand it appears. David Bowie has a characteristic B going into his name and this one is missing that and the overall formation looks wrong.  And thats not how he puts a date on an item generally. Im not terribly good and S and G, but the signatures dont match my PSA'd Paul or my Art. I am confident they are all fake.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on January 21, 2013 at 10:10am

I wish this was a joke. Because all of these albums are so far off from real autographs from the artists. You can just compare with real autographs that I have got in person from all of these artists. I know that signatures changes over time, but not like this. And if you have been out collecting autographs in person, you will know how hard it is to get complete sets of a band.

One example is that Paul Simon refuses to sign any Simon and Garfunkel albums. No matter if it has been signed by Art or not. You will be happy if he even sign at all.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Arvind Mohindra on January 21, 2013 at 10:12am

interesting to know on Simon & Garfunkel part of it!! Did not know that at all :-)

yeah the other signatures are terrible mess and that is what i thought as well!!

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page