Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by MATTHEW S on December 27, 2012 at 9:00pm

Well I wouldnt have a reason for that unless he just got it authenticated at the time of received the autograph for future purposes. I am not really sure...but if the signature looks that off to you, who I believe is very educated in MJ auto's then I will take your word on it if it isn't worth my time to mess with...like I said I do not want to waste any more money than I have to!  I do thank you sir for your help and advice!

 

Permalink Reply by MATTHEW S on December 27, 2012 at 8:16pm

I am not sure but I think you are correct after doing more research.  She said it was personally signed by Michael for her son-in-law, as I stated earlier, she said was a sports photographer primarily for chicago during the 90s.  I guess her story sold me more than anything.  Luckily I didn't get too deep at only $100

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve on December 27, 2012 at 8:04pm

No good in my opinion.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Carl Ryan on December 27, 2012 at 8:10pm

The angle of the M in comparison to the rest of the signature looks off to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mykaphobic on January 28, 2013 at 4:01am

It's off. A lot of his non uda ones are. i was told he signed a different way in person then for uda. that means most of the ones that look great are fake. But I have seen a lot worse get authenticated so I think it's worth "waisting" another $100 and you can then sell for $500 :)

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page