Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Carl Ryan on February 8, 2013 at 9:12pm

To me the Nils Lofgren looks very strange. But this could be from a time period i am not familiar with. You might want to ask Roger Epperson for his opinion.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on February 9, 2013 at 4:40am

This album is not genuine. All of the signatures are off. They are a good attempt, but not the real deal. No matter what the COA is saying.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joseph Roberts on February 9, 2013 at 5:38am

Thank you for you input.  What makes them look off to you?  I'd like to give my friend the feedback.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on February 9, 2013 at 8:12am

The Nils Lofgren autograph looks nothing like any of his autographs that I have seen. And the R and B in Roy Bittan are also off. The same with the x in Max. Also it's very rare that Bruce is breaking up Springsteen. He usually sign it in one straight line. I have one where he have broken up his name like this one. But like I said. It's very rare. I am including a picture of a Tunnel of Love album that I have got signed in person. It will show a little about what I mean.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on February 9, 2013 at 9:10am

I don't like the look of this!

My in-person Bruce and E Street Band attached.

Richard.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• image.jpg, 185 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on February 9, 2013 at 9:27am

My Bruce in-person signature..

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• image.jpg, 187 KB

• ▶ Reply