Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 25, 2013 at 3:40pm

Impossible to be 100% certain from that pic but it does have positive characteristics

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mykaphobic on February 25, 2013 at 5:41pm

Looks good

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Brick Hunter on February 26, 2013 at 2:17am

There's a flash right in the meat of the signature. Too dark to take a good picture, the seller needs to provide a scan.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by J.Seah on February 26, 2013 at 6:38am

I have requested a better picture from the seller. Thanks

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by J.Seah on February 26, 2013 at 9:50am

Here is a better picture of the Michael Jordan Autograph. It is signed on a 8 X 10 picture from FAME.(Falk Associates Management Enterprises) who is the agent for Michael Jordan. What is a realistic price if it is authentic?? Thanks again.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RYAN ESTALLO on April 28, 2013 at 5:30pm

No doubt about it. That jordan signature is 100% authentic. Thats one of his earlier signature around his college years. I guarantee it will pass any authenticated branch.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Travis Christenberry on April 28, 2013 at 5:34pm

How could it be from his college years when it's a photo of him in his Bulls uniform? That's way off.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RYAN ESTALLO on April 28, 2013 at 5:49pm

you know what travis your right. mybad im getting s*** twisted cuz I have a photo with that same signature and he was wearing his carolina blues. but its authentic cuz I have the psa certs. lol u got me on that one just cuz im a lil faded. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Travis Christenberry on April 28, 2013 at 5:50pm

Oh, don't get me wrong, I think the autograph is real but I think it's from the early 90's.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RYAN ESTALLO on April 28, 2013 at 5:52pm

A G R E E E

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 26, 2013 at 12:34pm

I have to say I am just not sure about this one.  two things concern me, one is the spacing between his names (or lack thereof) and the J looks really strange, in the upper formation.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mykaphobic on February 26, 2013 at 5:57pm

I'm the same. But I have seen some old ones very similar.
The J looks weird to me but at one time he fully looped the J.
This could be a progression from the full loop to the J we see today.
I'd be interested to know how old the photo is or when it was signed.
I can't see the shoes well enough to know the year. I would guess 1990.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page