Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on June 17, 2013 at 4:49pm

I'd like to see a better pic, but the John, George and Ringo appear to be authentic. The Paul doesn't look authentic to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on June 17, 2013 at 6:26pm

I agree with Ballroom.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Xperttexpert on June 17, 2013 at 6:38pm

agree with ballroom and terrrier, john, george, and ringo look real, the other page with paul does not.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by spaceman on June 17, 2013 at 9:27pm

I second that Xperttexpert.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KarlKeaton on June 17, 2013 at 9:51pm

Could with another scan really as the Paul is a bit small but at a glance I concor with the consensus so far; John, George and Ringo genuine, Paul fake.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lewis Reynolds on June 18, 2013 at 6:11am

Heres a better image of it. I agree the Paul is a bit funky.

The rest look fine.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• beats.jpg, 831 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on June 18, 2013 at 10:27am

better picture, but opinion is the same.  I doubt very much that the Mc is authentic. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KarlKeaton on June 18, 2013 at 6:50am

Paul did sometimes give a signature with an 'angular' ending in 1963 which is why I enquired about a better scan (thanks Lewis). However, After looking at the better scan I'm still of the opinion that this signature isn't authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Beatleworld on June 18, 2013 at 1:27pm

Yep, Paul definitely no good....is that Tony Meehan's auto above the fake paul ?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on June 18, 2013 at 6:22pm

The John...George and Ringo look good....the same cannot be said for the McCartney...

• ▶ Reply