We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Hey fellow AMLers, I just traded for four baseballs and was wondering whether two of them (the two most desirable) are genuine. Well, at least in your opinion.

 

Here are the photos:

 

The Mantle ball was used during batting practice/casual hitting during an alumni/old timers game and shows good wear for its age. The Williams ball is in amazing condition in my opinion and is definitely of the period (1990s) but you cant really see the wear in the photo. I got a GREAT deal on the two (well from my opinion) through trade so I'm just wondering what you guys think of them. Thanks!

Views: 846

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Kinda hard to see the Mantle, but they both look good IMO. 

Yeah sorry, its a bit faded and I can't get a great picture haha. I've looked at several KNOWN authentic signatures and mine has all the characteristics. Thanks again!

Anyone know if I can find a list of alumni Yankee games or old timers games somewhere? With like rosters and stuff

I would say your good on both of em. 

the mantle looks ok from what I can see, but I have doubts about the williams

Is it the two dots terrier?  And the T in Ted?  I looked at this for awhile.  But I did some comparisons and thought it might be real. 

the d and the a formation, the transition into the W, pen pressure.  I would not buy this.

I did too and compared it to several known authentic pieces. What the collector told me is that 3 balls I bought (Williams, Jeter, Arod were signed in private signings. The Jetrr has a Steiner and MLB COA/holo and the Arod has an ASI COA. Not sure if does anything to back up the Williams auto, but maybe he put more detail with more time in a private signing?

Now that you mention that Terrier, it is quite "bold". After going through my exemplars it does compare to this forgery:

Mike, it may be worth it to do a PSA "Quick Opinion" on it, which is less than $10. I am back and forth on this one.

The mantle looks good. The only thing I don't like about the Williams is the "a" is open.

Look at the "a" on this one.

also the baseline.  many of williams singed balls had an inconsistent baseline, like the one in the JSA photo.

I've been doing research myself, the Williams looks very similar to several UDA ones that were signed in private sittings. If I were to guess I'd say that's the origin of this ball. You guys think it's worth having sent in?$

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service