Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Mark Saurin on March 23, 2014 at 10:51am

Not a great expert on Clint, but, looks okay to me

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on March 23, 2014 at 3:28pm

Thanks for your comment mark

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on March 23, 2014 at 3:53pm

I'm not so sure about that. I do not believe it is authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on March 23, 2014 at 4:16pm

Thanks terrier,
Do you think this is a secretarial by any chance?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on March 23, 2014 at 5:17pm

It could be. I'm not that familiar with his secretariats.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by George Karr on March 24, 2014 at 3:17am

I think it's secreterial. Look here link . It looks like the last one.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on March 24, 2014 at 8:54am

Thanks for all your advice guys.
Quality

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on March 24, 2014 at 2:52pm

It is probably secreterial but not clint.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dan Gregory on March 24, 2014 at 4:06pm

Definitely not signed by Clint

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve on March 27, 2014 at 7:28pm

This was not signed by Clint.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Viola on March 28, 2014 at 6:27am

that one looks ok to me.  Similar to my IP.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike P on March 28, 2014 at 9:39am

Definitely secretarial . Refer to the signature study we had:http://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/clint-eastwood-signa...

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page