Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by DB on March 11, 2011 at 10:13am

I am always concerned about the older SB COAs as they were alot like Nicholas Burczyk ones.  They can proliferate especially when it comes to EBAY.  There really is no check and balance of COA to the Item.  The newer ones as depicted here at least now name the individual on the item but is it this item.

 

http://sportscardinfo.wordpress.com/2010/03/24/another-note-on-scor...  (case in point from about a year ago on the older ones)

 

here is a Tri-Star Ripken.  While there are similarities there are also some differences as well;

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on March 11, 2011 at 10:37am

It's good to be cautious. I sent this to one of our experts, who thinks it's real.

But don't chew on it or you'll destroy its value.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jorge Marin on March 11, 2011 at 4:39pm

Thanks for the reply and input, guys. IMO, I thought the autograph looks pretty good, but wanted to reassure myself with the Ebay seller.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by DB on March 11, 2011 at 6:04pm

who was the ebay seller?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jorge Marin on March 11, 2011 at 6:17pm

The Score Board.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by The Autograph Hound on June 15, 2011 at 11:23pm

The autograph looks good. Maybe because he has signed so many items, that his signature has diminished in value to the point that you got a good deal from this seller.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TB12 on June 28, 2014 at 5:38pm

This is a legit Ripken ball. Nice!

• ▶ Reply