We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
I am looking at a collection of 1940s and early 1950s photographs. They are all inscribed to a son of a studio employee. There are a bunch of lower end autographs from a value standpoint but one of the biggest photos is a Bogart. It is a nice studio portrait by Bert Six but the Bogart signature looks different than other examples I have seen. Especially the "t" having a loop instead of the typical bogart of t that has a straight line to the right. I had previously posted one autograph that looked close to the one I am looking at but wanted to get an opinion on the actual signature. These photos were all in a scrapbook and they are all 70 to 80 year old photos and most have inscriptions to the same person. Thank you in advance for your opinions.
Tags:
This doesn't look good either. Closer than the last one, though.
I agree with you about the atypical "t". Also the "H" is very odd and especially connected to the "u". Things really fall apart in that surname.
Honestly, the whole thing looks off. Rather than a forgery, this looks to be just a period secretarial.
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on October 30, 2024 at 3:13pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service