Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by goodcat on August 22, 2018 at 10:05pm

Looks like everyone is calling it a secretarial 

I would tend to believe those who say this. 

For me, I'm seeing a mix but that "E" is really out in left field. So I'm giving it a question mark because of the "d" 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Abcd on August 23, 2018 at 2:21am

Secretarial.

https://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/clint-eastwood

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by goodcat on August 23, 2018 at 2:40am

Michael 

If you look again at your link, you'll see the OP Eastwood resembles the authentic radio sig over the secretarial

The answer is in the "d"

A secretarial "d" looks more like a "y" while authentic looks like a proper "d" 

The OP sig is almost half and half... but to me it's more authentic style 

Which is why I'm not sure 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Abcd on August 23, 2018 at 2:43am

Would you buy it? I wouldn't. Look a the 'd'

Marcus Brandes (Secretarial from the 1980s)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by goodcat on August 23, 2018 at 2:59am

Good point and nearly a perfect match. 

That example might have just swayed my opinion. 

NO  I would not buy it 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on August 23, 2018 at 9:18am

Speaking of Eastwood. This one has driven me a bit crazy. I've had this for a few years, have discussed this on this site previously with mixed reactions. Would like to see if some new eyes can be helpful. Is it Clint's signature or someone else's? Supposed signed in NYC in the late 80's.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on August 23, 2018 at 10:17am

That one looks good

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on August 23, 2018 at 10:45am

I do want to make a correction to the signing date of the Eastwood I posted. I checked my records and the signature was signed in the mid 1990's in NYC. Not late 80's. Sorry, it's been awhile since I discovered it again in my storage box! Thanks for you input, Terrier!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on August 23, 2018 at 11:54am

This one is not legible, is condensed, not wide open :) Nice :)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on August 23, 2018 at 11:55am

Thanks, Eric.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Abcd on August 23, 2018 at 12:10pm

Looks a bit odd 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on August 23, 2018 at 12:46pm

I understand where you are coming from, Michael. It does display a neater appearance than the usual Eastwood rushed in person signature. Guess that's why I get mixed opinions on this one. Although, I do believe it was signed by him. I do appreciate your input. I didn't get this in person so opinions matter. The more eyes the better.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page