Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Alessio on April 30, 2024 at 4:09pm

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jason H on April 30, 2024 at 5:12pm

Its interesting witnessing new collectors question stan lee's autographs. As someone who started over 30 years ago. Stan was someone who was easily accessible in the past. Im guessing there are a lot of generic COAs with his signature. Most will be worthless. It doesn't mean anything about the signature.. on the other side, focusing on just the signature, there are areas of concern. I have a stan autograph I received 20 years ago and looks a bit different but im no expert on his signature. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable will chime in but I would question this signature only and forget about the COA.. as for the signature itself, its been too long time away but the body of the signature is questionable to me

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eddy on April 30, 2024 at 7:18pm

The COA accompanying it does this no favors. 

Here's their page describing the work of their "experts":

https://www.forensicautographauthentication.com/Staff.html

We've heard it all before...it's just missing the imposing fake law enforcement badge.

Here was another discussion about them:

https://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/need-help-with-a-fr...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on May 1, 2024 at 6:17pm

That's not real IMO. And autographs with COAs from forensic examiners or any COA that mentions "forensic" are almost always forgeries. I was going to say they're fake 99.9% of the time but that would be generous.

Get a refund, ASAP.

• ▶ Reply