Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on August 1, 2013 at 10:26am

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• RS Litho 1.JPG, 1.1 MB
• RS Litho 2.jpg, 1.1 MB
• RS Litho 3.jpg, 1.7 MB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JXE on August 1, 2013 at 10:46am

I wonder what Roger's opinion on this one would be. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on August 1, 2013 at 11:01am

I don't know what he would say.it's definitely the real mcoy.he would have to deem it authentic.psa/DNA handed it back to me when they authenticated it personally and they really appreciated seeing the piece that day.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on August 1, 2013 at 11:25am

I own the exile Lithograghs also.they came in a huge black box,that was broken but the lithos are very nice .there is three of them as you seen them.Jagger signed one,richards signed one and watts signed one.it comes in a real nice leather bound portfolio.the box was shattered when I received it.I called them about it and they actually sent me another box.so the answer to the question is they all signed the three.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JXE on August 1, 2013 at 11:33am

I found this while googling around: it's a special with a free litho with the purchase of the super deluxe set. It must be an expired offer, but that seemed like a killer deal!

http://media.musictoday.com/store/bands/191/images/stoneslithosplas...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Karl Jeffs on August 1, 2013 at 11:40am

Shame, I would have bought it right then!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on August 1, 2013 at 11:55am

You guys are not gonna believe this but I purchased my Jeff koons litho last week.I bought it off of eBay. It was in mint condition brand new etc.he put a buy it now on it for 1000.00 I bought ot immediately,my only concern was...why is he selling it sooooo cheap? Affter I payed him thru pay pal I asked him why so cheap and he said he got it for free on the rs website with his exile litho purchase. I didn't believe him but I didn't care to either because I knew it was real.JXE you now solved this mystery for me.I just got the piece 2 days ago.it's beautiful.I don't understand how rs website could give them away like that.like I was saying just a few weeks ago theytold me 3800.00 .I can't believe they were giving them away.I guess I now believe the person I got mine from.ithink I got a great deal for 1000.00 anyway.I'll post the pictures when I get home.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on August 1, 2013 at 10:27am

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on August 1, 2013 at 10:28am

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on August 1, 2013 at 10:44am

Just out of curiosity, is everything about the actual lithographs the same--- do you notice anything different in the numbered one vs the unnumbered?  I think that would also be helpful.  (paper type, watermarks of any sort, exact size etc etc). 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on August 1, 2013 at 10:54am

They are the same.same quality paper stock,identical in quality.personally I like my sigs on the unnumbered one better.I think it's the nicer one of the two.but I think the numbered one is worth more because of the limited run.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JXE on August 1, 2013 at 11:11am

I also think the non-numbered one has more appealing sigs. The Mick auto certainly looks more unusual on the numbered one. I'm not saying it's not authentic, just saying I like the auto on the unnumbered one better.

I spent  a lot of time looking for my favorite autos on the signed AC/DC prints they did. I wonder if a lot of people are picky like that, lol!

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• Next ›
• Page