Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Rich on April 3, 2017 at 3:49pm

Maybe it's an age thing, but Lloyd really doesn't seem right. Overall, I'd be curious how he got it. Thompson, Lloyd and more recently Fox have done conventions. The other names would be a bit tougher to get.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Saurin on April 3, 2017 at 4:00pm

The Lloyd is why I to am concerned he has a very nice signature, looking at this l am one, it's very confusing, the names on this poster are as follows 

Michael J Fox

Christopher Lloyd

Lea Thompson

Crispin Glover

Claudia Wells

Thomas F Wilson

James Tolkan

Wendie Jo Sperber

Billy Zane

Robert Zemeckis

Steven Spielberg

Thanks for your feedback Rich really do appreciate it

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on April 3, 2017 at 4:08pm

Can you show the Glover? He usually adds an inscription/message, as the only way to get him seems to be to attend one of his film screenings. Wendie Jo died years ago, and I'm thinking she would have been one of the tougher additions. Tom Wilson just started attended conventions having previously opted to avoid signing BTTF items. Zemekis and Speilberg are Hollywood powerhouses. The whole thing just has a lot of questions I'd want answered.

Side note: I found that a Return of the Jedi with a Keith Upchurch COA sold on eBay for under $200. While the image is no longer visible, a poster featuring authentic signatures of the principle cast, including Ford, Hamill, Fisher, Lucas, Oz etc. would most certainly not go for under $200.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/signed-return-of-the-jedi-poster-27-x-41-/1...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Saurin on April 3, 2017 at 4:33pm

Here is Chrispin Glover, Stephen Spielberg, Robert Zemeckis, by the way this poster isn't going to be cheap....trust me

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• 20170403_210454[1].jpg, 4 MB
• 20170403_210438[1].jpg, 4 MB
• 20170403_210501[1].jpg, 4.3 MB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on April 3, 2017 at 4:38pm

I think you posted Tom Wilson instead of Crispin. My general sense, even with limited knowledge of the signatures I've seen, is that this isn't right. Curious to see others' input.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Saurin on April 3, 2017 at 4:39pm

like wise....

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Saurin on April 3, 2017 at 4:48pm

here is what the poster looks like in full

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• 20170404_004125[1].jpg, 4.6 MB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on April 3, 2017 at 4:57pm

I can't see Tolkan or Glover at all (the light signature in the upper right, I assume, is supposed to be Claudia Wells. I also see what appears to be Drew Struzan, who inexplicably added '85. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Saurin on April 3, 2017 at 5:23pm

here is a Crispin Glover

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• 20170404_005236.jpg, 4.3 MB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on April 3, 2017 at 5:21pm

As I noted in our DM, that looks like unusually neat handwriting for Glover, who often includes his middle name and an inscription (i.e. "Thank you for coming to see [whatever film he's screaming]") I think some IP collectors have noted that this is how he's been for a long time.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Saurin on April 3, 2017 at 5:25pm

Rich....many thanks for your help on this matter, being honest with you i don't usually go for modern signed items for exactly this reason these modern day signatures are a nightmare to deal with

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Robert Chase on April 3, 2017 at 7:27pm

In my opinion this Spielberg is not authentic and I agree the Lloyd looks off. This whole poster might just be off.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page