We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Hello,

I  bought this a few days ago in an auction.

It is an full color intact pull-out photo included in an 1964 UK-magazine called „Scream“.

I‘m very interested to know what you think about it, thank you.

Views: 9536

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

+1

CNN did a piece on last fall's GHIRR sale that included an image of it:

https://www.cnn.com/style/article/beatles-memorabilia-auction-scli-...

The price paid at Iconic is serious money, whether real or not. You have to ask yourself how something can be so perfect.

Yes, and I don't like the answer I arrive at.

Not good:

They are remarkably similar but I guess they are at least handwritten given that they are not absolutely identical.

I'm not sure what level of variation can be achieved with the devices described previously.

Both sets do look overly neat and clean, but I don't think they're both machine signed if they're both fake. Too many other sets of for them to choose from

Whatever they are, they make me very nervous with the other data presented.

It's always bad when somebody is better at signing Beatles than the Beatles. I can't imagine having the skills to crack forging an item of this value at quality good enough for getting it okay'd by 2 TPAs, consigning it to an auction... and then having the nerve to do the exact same thing with the same auction house with nearly identical signatures. I guess it shouldn't be that shocking, but still.

But we have seen a high end rock item pass 2 "unimpeachable" sources and still be a forgery.

I consider the Royal Command Performance  magazine signatures the 3rd set with issues. You will not find the beatles fingerprints on any of the three items. This forum was created to probe and test the veracity of the so called experts. 

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service