We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Beatles Real ?

What do the experts think of this

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 17, 2023 at 1:12pm

It looks real to me. I moved this to the Beatles forum.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on September 17, 2023 at 2:00pm

Looks OK to me...Card was issued in March 1963...autographs look to be around the time of issue...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on September 17, 2023 at 2:06pm

Just been told it comes with a tracks coa

What would be a fair price

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 17, 2023 at 2:30pm

It’s hard to say because the condition is so rough. This looks like it was signed the same day, so you can see what it originally looked like.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 17, 2023 at 3:07pm

I get much higher resolution, larger and sharper photos, front and back.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Saunders on September 17, 2023 at 2:48pm

I'd save up for a better piece.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on September 17, 2023 at 5:16pm

Agreed. Half the signatures have some sort of problem. This is exactly the presentation I would expect from an advanced forger.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on September 17, 2023 at 9:01pm

I think we've established it's authentic. It had a track coa

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 17, 2023 at 10:33pm

There are counterfeit, altered, and copied Tracks LOAs; the signed item could be switched or a copy; and while it's extremely rare, Tracks could have made a mistake.

Never buy based on the COA or LOA alone.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on September 17, 2023 at 11:27pm

That's why i asked for opinions. I won't be buying it because he wants £4000.

I was pointing out that the feedback indicates that it is authentic

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on September 18, 2023 at 11:30am

I never said this was not authentic - I said it was a problem so rough. I also said that it was the sort of presentation I would expect from an advanced forger, not that this was a forgery.