Authenticity is Everything
AutographLive will be buggy tonight while we test code we're developing for it. Everything should work fine within the next 3-5 hours.
(I wrote this at 7 PM PST.)
Elizabeth Taylor
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on
-
Both forgeries IMO.
-
Permalink Reply by Lars Olav Karlsen on
-
It was recived thru mail, so eithet its real or secreterial.
-
-
They are not secretarials I have seen.
-
-
Here is Richard Burton in 1970.
-
-
There are indications that the OP is by one hand.
-
Permalink Reply by Joe W. on
-
This is a tough call on the Taylor. There are a couple of atypical aspects to her signature in the OP. With that said, it has a decent chance of being a rushed signature. The personalization adds credibility to it. I give it a 70% chance of passing a TPA.
The Burton seems like it's too neat for what I would suspect. If he signed this it was in a very calm circumstance. I personally don't know Burton enough to say so.
Odd. One very rushed and the other very calm.
-
-
Hi Joe, look at the two "u"'s in the Burton's, the angles of both "t"'s and the trail off backstroke after the "n"'s. Also where is her "r" to be seen?
-
-
I meant to include this RR Auction signature study on Liz. It has a nice example of her "Burton" signature. I don't like Taylor being on the same plain as her first name in the OP. I question it but cannot rule it out.
https://d9qs7xii78j0x.cloudfront.net/content/pdf/Autograph_Magazine...
-
-
That is the example at thecead which caused me to ask "where is her "r""? And the "l" is looking like her "T" in the first name - haven't seen that... also, I meant compare the "ur" connection in her "Burton" with the "u" in his. Good observation re plane.
-
-
It wery well could have been a secretary, it was recived by mail from their home in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico
© 2025 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
