PLEASE ASK QUESTIONS IN THE DISCUSSION FORUMS, NOT BLOGS.
READ THIS BEFORE YOU POST, THANKS.

Hi folks. New to the forum, but long time collector. To me, this early ‘55/‘56 era Elvis was a slam dunk. It’s even PSA encapsulated. For the heck of it, I submitted to BAS/Beckett quick opinion and they failed it. So who got it wrong, PSA or BAS? I think BAS screwed up on this one, would love some opinions.

Views: 324

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

The photo is too blurry for me to say more than the shape looks like a genuine Elvis but I need a sharp photo to give you my opinion on authenticity. A copy could have a genuine-looking shape, too.

Here’s a better image:

Thank you 

In my opinion it is real too. Typical signature for 1955/1956. 

Ballroom, Joe, thanks. I feel strongly that it's real. The small letters are signed more flowingly than most Elvis autographs, especially the "vi", which may have concerned the authenticator at BAS. Compare it to Ballroom's and you'll see what I mean.

Thanks Steve 

Sorry late to the  party here.

It's genuine in my opinion. Here is a similar one from the Graceland sale a little while ago.

Regards,

Mark 

RSS

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2021   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service