Elvis Presley PSA/DNA

Hi folks. New to the forum, but long time collector. To me, this early ‘55/‘56 era Elvis was a slam dunk. It’s even PSA encapsulated. For the heck of it, I submitted to BAS/Beckett quick opinion and they failed it. So who got it wrong, PSA or BAS? I think BAS screwed up on this one, would love some opinions.

0 members like this

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on April 15, 2021 at 12:32pm

The photo is too blurry for me to say more than the shape looks like a genuine Elvis but I need a sharp photo to give you my opinion on authenticity. A copy could have a genuine-looking shape, too.

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on April 15, 2021 at 12:35pm

Here’s a better image:

Permalink Reply by JoeInOhio on April 15, 2021 at 12:37pm

Thank you

Permalink Reply by Karsten on April 15, 2021 at 11:37pm

In my opinion it is real too. Typical signature for 1955/1956.

Permalink Reply by JoeInOhio on April 15, 2021 at 12:35pm

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on April 15, 2021 at 12:45pm

Ballroom, Joe, thanks. I feel strongly that it's real. The small letters are signed more flowingly than most Elvis autographs, especially the "vi", which may have concerned the authenticator at BAS. Compare it to Ballroom's and you'll see what I mean.

Permalink Reply by JoeInOhio on April 15, 2021 at 1:16pm

Thanks Steve

Permalink Reply by Mark Adams on April 15, 2021 at 11:06pm