Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 3, 2019 at 6:52am

this looks good to me

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on September 3, 2019 at 10:36am

More "yes" than "no"....

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 3, 2019 at 11:19am

This looks good to me too.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim McFiver on September 3, 2019 at 9:47pm

Despite the unanimity of opinion, I don't like it. There are several components which don't quite match up for me, including the distorted G and the jumbo N.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on September 3, 2019 at 10:33pm

Authentic in my opinion

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by george enrique on September 3, 2019 at 11:44pm

100% authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 4, 2019 at 12:17am

I think that there's a good chance this isn't real.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 4, 2019 at 7:55am

According to the seller, it’s from 1988.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 4, 2019 at 10:23am

Is there a head-on photo?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 4, 2019 at 11:07am

The image in the OP is the only one that I've seen.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 4, 2019 at 11:36am

Thanks. Ones only photographed at steep angles often make me a bit wary. This one is probably OK.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Beatleworld on September 4, 2019 at 1:06pm

Nothing wrong with this one, 100% authentic. 

• ▶ Reply