We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Tags:
I think its real, it matches alot of his newer signatures..
I would lean towards authentic as well
And... that's a really great photo and sig placement/contrast
both examples posted are nice pieces
There's 4 factors that I dislike about this one.
Best,
Justin
Indeed, I spent all day authenticating items on RACC and now I'm running through the threads on AML. 12 hours of studying so far today, how about you?
Would you like me to list the factors that appear incorrect in this Clapton? The E-bottom isn't round enough, the ric is too low overall relative to the E. The final line curves up going right, rather than it's usual down.
If I can make a living authenticating all day and helping people make informed decisions, I'd enjoy that.
Best,
Justin
What do you mean "E" bottom isn't round enough?
Eric quite often normally has a kink in the bottom of his "E"
There.... I just gave a secret away haha
I agree with Tim about not advertising here
Please check the other factors and comment on those as well. And yes, the E's bottom is too wide relative to it's height. Typically it is more round, like a bubble.
It's just too many factors for me. The photo shared for comparison looks as expected.
Is that suppose to be signed twice? A faint black signature signed above the guitar?
Right? Would be helpful to see a clearer shot of the black one for comparison.
I don't eat donuts, I prefer fruits and vegetables.
No donuts? Ever? One of life's sweeter pleasures, imo!
I mean, maybe. If they're vegan I'd consider. But I have this plan to live passed 100, so I'm trying to stick to a diet that contributes to the goal.
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on October 30, 2024 at 3:13pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service