We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

The Jackie Gleason Autograph Thread! Genuine examples from every period! Cavalcade of Secretarials! Saddleman, Spear and Marilyn Gleason!

***************************************************************

The October 27th, 2018 update is what should be seen here first so until the rewrite it is below:

PRESENTING! THE CULMINATION OF THIS PROJECT! FIRST TIME EVER?!

Jackie Gleason's secretarial signature sources (and 1 wife) BY NAME (where possible). The vast bulk of the secretarials out there will be by Spear from the later 1970's on to 1987 on anything in felt tip, usually black, and then Saddleman on the 1950's postcards in blue fountain ink most often. Forgeries are of course more common than anything. After those and the secretarials shown by name below, the signing secretarials are encountered (infrequently, fountain and often ballpoint, on portraits mostly), then Marilyn Gleason (ballpoint and perhaps 1 fountain pen so far C. 1970's,), and last...finally, The Great One (pencil, fountain (black and blue with some oddities in the late 1960's), ballpoint (usually blue), felt tip (black and blue) etc.).

"...And away we go!..."

Click for large image please.This image has been updated October 29, 2018 to show the largest examples clearly.

Photo reposted Oct. 30th, 2018. PM 10.29.18 Improved with better, larger scans, more accurate date windows and expanded to show a later Saddleman as well (!):

******************************************************************

And the "old" article, undergoing full revision follows...


Hello,

I thought this composite might be useful in identifying the rampant secretarials of Jackie Gleason's signature that are offered, both raw and certified. The topic has risen before, but I did not see this all laid out simply and clearly labeled. Gleason's authentic signature is very rare in any form. Almost everything out there is a secretarial or poor forgery, especially the 1970's signatures, although this is changing now (10/28/18) as the forgers attempt to create 1950's signatures. The comments below concern the scans above as shown.

The authentic example from 1951 shown is typical of this period, not terribly neat, sometimes slightly flowery if messy, and with a rather bouncy base line (especially early examples) in "jackie", which often appears as "jockie". Note the overall shape and slight lean of the "a" in Jockie" compared to the secretarials (much more round). Note the attack of the "jackie", the connection of the "j" to the "a", and the clear construction and articulation of the "k" (hooking back and under). Sometimes the "e" in "jackie" is a touch higher than the "i" and leans back a bit to the left. Also note the differences in the formation of the "g" in "gleason" with the 1950's secretarial (and the form of the "ason"). The "a" in "gleason" is often complex and dense as it goes back on itself. Ink dispersal shows a rather quick hand compared to all the secretarials, with most ink in the last "a". Authentic examples are very hard to find and rather expensive if identified. Very early examples show him singing both names in a single line, even almost connecting first and last names, but then he started signing on two lines by C. 1949. Gleason's signature remained more or less the same, sometimes taking on a more extreme slant, until the early 1960's, after which it became a bit more scrawled and often more simplified. Most authentic examples appear to come from the 1950's and are often found on album pages; examples from the 1960's can be found on playbills and theater programs as well as other items. From what little I have seen, most all later examples (mid 1970's and on) exhibit more variation and extreme simplification in the last years and are seldom encountered. They should be priced accordingly.

The 1950's secretarials are easily spotted by an overall drawn quality, extreme neatness, straight baseline, even ink dispersal/pressure, and the very similar "j" and "g" bottom loops. Do not ignore this. The formation of the letters in first and last names is very different - the first "a" is often quite round, and the "ason" in "gleason" is quite different from the authentic (see the elongated space between the "a" and "s" in the secretarial) and is always legible (true of most all secretarials), with no ending trail off that melds the final letters. This is important. Early examples can show an elongated thinner "j" (now added in a composite scan posted below), but are readily betrayed by the rest of the signature which displays hesitance and the drawn quality and form. These 3.5" x 5" secretarials exist in quantity, yet I believe are still quite collectible as period items - if you wrote to the Jackie Gleason Show during the 1950's this is indeed what you would have received. Very few if any of these bear authentic signatures. They were usually signed by secretary Patricia Saddleman, who admitted to signing all of his mail at the time on a broadcast (1956) of What's My Line.

*

The 1960's secretarials are even more obvious with very even ink dispersal, a very different overall slant compared to either the authentic or earlier secretarials, a straight base line, a different formation overall and of the last name in particular. The "j" in "jackie" is not connected to the "a" as the authentic. The capitalized "E" in "glEason" first appears about C. 1959 on the earlier C. 1954 PC's images, many times from the same source but I digress. They bear ballpoint signatures that appear much like the 1960's version(s). Several examples exist with the capital "E" ALL c. 1959/60, so that one can distinguish the forged from the secretarial apart from the other problems. Note the opposing slants of the "j" and "k" in "jackie" compared with the authentic example - same holds true for the 1970's and 1980's. These 3.5" x 5" secretarials with the "E" do not show up as frequently as the earlier 1950's 3.5" x 5" secretarials which are comparatively common. There is another scarcer 3.5" x 5" early 1960's (Perhaps 1963) version showing Gleason on stage in front of curtains with a raised arm - I have seen this version bear the shown 1960's secretarial signatures (not all with "E") and, very rarely, a genuine signature. If my memory serves, I have seen a very few stamped versions of just the standing pose from Miami.

The 1970's secretarials, as those of the 1980's, are also very neat and exhibit very consistent ink dispersal even if more fluidly executed. These later secretarials are usually accompanied with the inscription "My Best Wishes" and a "dash" "-"; and display a slant to the right, posses a readily identifiable "j", and the "k" is formed very much like the "i" and "e" - with all reaching the same height. There is usually a space before and/or after the "a" in "jackie" (lone "a"),and often a space before the "a" in "gleason". The last name appears to be broken into two or three segments. There can be some variation of the "g" (thinner bottom loop, angular tipped) but the rest of the signature will quickly confirm the secretarial (the "j", which sometimes has a loop at the top and a slightly varying flourish, and then the "g"). These secretarials are extremely common, generally accepted as genuine, and are usually seen on 8" x 10" cast signed bus photographs (with the rest often authentic), fan letters, personal portraits and, later, 5" x 7" portraits. The signature is almost always in black felt tip without regard to what the item is; this allows ready examination of the ink and pressure changes which will reveal the secretarial. The presence of a "dash" is problematic -  limited to secretarials only - I have yet to see a genuine example with a "dash". As of 11/23 this holds true.

Below is another authentic vintage signature - a superb example in pencil that dates to shortly after the 1951 example above. It is a wonderful example of the true signature of The Great One.

Additional authentic signatures from 1944 to 1961 can be see here (the 1948 example is very useful, but they all are of great value in this discussion), as well as a confirmed common secretarial from the 1970's:

Jackie Gleason Confirmed Authentic Exemplars at The Classic Enterta...

Note: If you have an authentic Gleason signature or another type of secretarial from any period and would like to share it for the purposes of this article please contact me. Member Bob Shinn also has a superb example, but I wont post images w/o permission.

Eric

A large scan of the 1951 has been added as an attachment below.

Closing notes: It is sometimes said that Gleason's wife signed for him. She did! Marilyn Gleason, starting early, in about 1965. Gleason was married 1936-1970, 1970-1975, and 1975-1987. From what I have seen the "My Best Wishes" secretarials, which represent the overwhelming majority of signatures, start to appear on photographs from about 1975 on. The presence of this inscription does not equate with being a secretarial, but this is often the case. I also note the lack of any transitional examples of the secretarials. The little I have seen appears forged or unusual in some odd way. His authentic signature mutated slightly over the years while retaining basic elements, yet the secretarials just change violently. I have never seen the 1960's style secretarial signature shown in the composite above, whose appearance seems to correlate with his move to Miami in 1962, on anything but these small photographs from this period.

This article is under construction. Updated October 26, 2018 with much additional information and a new scan showing the most encountered secretarial signatures with the names of those who signed them along with Marilyn Gleason. © EKL 2018

Tags: Gleason, Jackie, autograph, forgery, genuine, secretarial

Views: 17853

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Still - this junk is around...$300 min bid. No bids yet - one can hope...

Good job Eric!   It is always distressing to see PSA-DNA, JSA, Beckett etc stamped items that are known secretarial or worse forged.  I wish all the major TPA's would take a few minutes and double check the obvious ones like Gleason, Griffith, Heston, Curtis, Van Dyke etc.   Would it take a little time?  Yes, but certainly their database must contain a search engine.  If I owned one of the companies would I try to contact the original submitter?  Absolutely because it would be my reputation on the line.  Everyone makes mistakes and most of these secretarial ones were thought to be good for years.  They should at the least have a page with those frequently bad ones and state these examples are no longer considered authentic.  This at least would let someone bidding on this go to their site and then see a warning after Gleason.  Hopefully it would mean they would not go through with the bid.  Personally I feel these companies by not addressing past mistakes are hurting their own reputations. 

Thanks Scott. I agree - your idea about showing some of the more common secretarials one encounters is sterling. Is it in the business model to have people...think for themselves? If the collector is paying attention he would not submit secretarials...hmm.

Forgot to update - this lot above, "To Sam", closed 3 days ago with no bids at $300, as did the previous secretarial which was offered twice in the last year at $150 and $200. This is a refreshing sign.

One can hope at least some buyers are starting to do a bit of research and finding your excellent work on the subject.  I wish more sellers would do so.  The problem is with a PSA or JSA or Beckett stamp no matter how bad the autograph is a seller will still offer it.  Until TPA's start to police their own opinions and stand by them this will continue to happen.

Exactly - the sticker and all that comes with it, real or imagined. I do not buy, sell or suggest stickered material. If asked to examine a stickered Gleason or Bowie or whatever, the sticker has no impact at all. Same work to be done. As we saw in the "Titanic"/Olympic thread, no one appears to be in a particular hurry for accuracy :(

I am sort of surprised the word "Primary" is even used...but not really.

Here are three examples of this signing secretarial, side by side. Consistently inconsistent - Gleason was just not this legible. 

Click for full image:

Another secretarial. This is an early signing secretarial. The same problems remain - straight baseline, the dash...everything already mentioned in this thread. The two strokes that make that "T" in "To"...I can not find the so-called "Vanderhoven" thread online, or it has been shortened/pruned. I believe I recall seeing this hand described as possibly genuine. It is not. 

It would be good if some of these "services" would adjust to what I loosely call "reality" - at the "Honeymooners" page 3 of the 5 Gleason exemplars shown appear secretarial or forgery(!); under "Gleason" 1 of the 3 (at least) shown appear secretarial/signing secretarial(!). With this thread and the combined knowledge of the members here, you should spot them quickly. The value of these has come down to where many will close w/o bid on eBay. So...why are they still up as exemplars? What folks are paying for I don't know sometimes, but I can sure guess what happens to folks who rely on some of those pages alone for exemplars. I recommend thecead.com for vintage exemplars - in conjunction with your accumulated knowledge and other sources.

I found it. This is what I have saved from that other older online discussion - it is indeed a match to this signing secretarial above:

Here is a batch of modern forgeries. Crude simulations executed in felt or fiber tip which is totally inappropriate for this earlier style.

And another, this from Florida:

And here is a superb authentic example of this early style in ball point. Like many early examples, he is pressing very hard as he writes - sometimes he goes right through the paper, esp with fountain pen nibs:

Hello All,

Looking at eBay way, nothing new to report here. The usual good contracts, the same secretarials and the forgeries of same; generally speaking later sigs but the attempts at earlier styles are increasing  though usually mindless. Some secretarials still getting over $100 most not. Some because of those darn stickers. Some ending w no bids. 

Hello All,

More "Gleason" garbage. This person is actually getting worse. I have many more scans from this source. I suppose it should be noted it is not made out to "Donna"...

Click for large image.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service