We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Has a PSA sticker but that doesn't always mean it's authentic.  Opinions? 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Paul-McCartney-Beatles-White-Album-Signed-...

Views: 1223

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Does anyone know why/how these PSA cards were accepted in the first place? These signatures are horrible forgeries!

Most people that want TPA COAs don't know what's real or not. That's why they want them.

Listing is no longer on eBay -- it says:  This listing was ended by the seller because the item is no longer available.

Here's cert# P12173, which also doesn't look authentic. It sold for $499 on offerup.com.

this is awful

I'm going to call PSA tomorrow about this. How could there be 3 McCartneys with PSA COAs when they're supposed to get LOAs because they cost over $50 to authenticate ($150)? And they're all on unimpressive forgeries.

Wonder if any came through P Pass.

This is odd. Here's what is claimed to be cert# P12174. The COA or LOA isn't pictured. I think it looks okay.

This must be a new scam where forgers go into the PSA online database and find items that are NOT pictured. Then they print up fake PSA certs and stickers knowing that if people look them up they won't see anything wrong (since it just says "McCartney signed album" when you punch in the cert #)  This would fool many average collectors.  Of course the way to stop this is for PSA to picture EVERY autograph but they are too lazy. 

I think an LOA was most likely issued for this one, and the sticker was placed on the LOA.

Agree Ballroom. The troubling thing to me is why is there no actual photo of the autograph on the PSA/DNA website?  This is standard practice for LOA’s as far as I know. So why is there no photo?

I was told that even with LOAs the item isn't always pictured in the database.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service