Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on March 7, 2015 at 5:37pm

Too small.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JBS on March 7, 2015 at 6:04pm

That's what she said :P

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Marcus on March 7, 2015 at 11:59pm

Hi Steve,

hope this is a little larger,thanks

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• michael jackson.JPG, 57 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on March 8, 2015 at 12:06am

I don't care for this one myself, and I do not like the L in Love either.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on March 8, 2015 at 12:45am

Here is a graphic I threw together so you can see what authentic "Love's" look like.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Marcus on March 8, 2015 at 2:18am

Hi Wascher,

Thanks for your analysis and time. Yes I can see your point it is unusual. Looking at the name ive included  a jpeg of a pic that was put on this website in 2012 and people were saying it looked genuine. The one on ebay looks very similar  through my eyes. What do you think ?

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• AutographPaperCut.jpg, 588 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on March 8, 2015 at 5:31am

The autograph you have shown I believe belonged to a gal named Charlotte who purchased it after MJ died, and somehow it was stolen from her (if this is the one I am remembering correctly).  She had asked what people thought, and I believe Wendy Christine was the only one who weighed in and she thought it might be good. 

I personally never liked that autograph and the reason why is because to me it looks almost too pretty and neat to be MJ.  But I could be wrong.  Its just my personal feeling on it.

I don't think yours looks the same, they look like they are from different hands.

-w

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Marcus on March 8, 2015 at 6:06am

Thanks again

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on March 7, 2015 at 10:09pm

I really don't like it myself. Steve's right. The pic is too small. Plus, the "M" doesn't look right, and the spacing of the lettering in Jackson looks strange.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Marcus on March 8, 2015 at 1:26am

Hi James,thanks , I've posted a larger JPEG to steve (above)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on March 9, 2015 at 1:03am

Not an authentic Michael Jackson autograph in my opinion

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Brian M. Wazac on March 14, 2015 at 11:21am

JBS......Too funny bro!

• ▶ Reply