We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

This is currently on ebay. I'm no expert but I've tried to compare it with some uacc authenticated signatures and it looks ok to me,any opinions please.

Views: 701

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Too small.

That's what she said :P

Hi Steve,

hope this is a little larger,thanks

Attachments: No photo uploads here

I don't care for this one myself, and I do not like the L in Love either.

Here is a graphic I threw together so you can see what authentic "Love's" look like.

Hi Wascher,

Thanks for your analysis and time. Yes I can see your point it is unusual. Looking at the name ive included  a jpeg of a pic that was put on this website in 2012 and people were saying it looked genuine. The one on ebay looks very similar  through my eyes. What do you think ?

Attachments: No photo uploads here

The autograph you have shown I believe belonged to a gal named Charlotte who purchased it after MJ died, and somehow it was stolen from her (if this is the one I am remembering correctly).  She had asked what people thought, and I believe Wendy Christine was the only one who weighed in and she thought it might be good. 

I personally never liked that autograph and the reason why is because to me it looks almost too pretty and neat to be MJ.  But I could be wrong.  Its just my personal feeling on it.

I don't think yours looks the same, they look like they are from different hands.

-w

Thanks again
I really don't like it myself. Steve's right. The pic is too small. Plus, the "M" doesn't look right, and the spacing of the lettering in Jackson looks strange.
Hi James,thanks , I've posted a larger JPEG to steve (above)
Not an authentic Michael Jackson autograph in my opinion

JBS......Too funny bro!

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service