This is currently on ebay. I'm no expert but I've tried to compare it with some uacc authenticated signatures and it looks ok to me,any opinions please.

Views: 711

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Too small.

That's what she said :P

Hi Steve,

hope this is a little larger,thanks

Attachments: No photo uploads here

I don't care for this one myself, and I do not like the L in Love either.

Here is a graphic I threw together so you can see what authentic "Love's" look like.

Hi Wascher,

Thanks for your analysis and time. Yes I can see your point it is unusual. Looking at the name ive included  a jpeg of a pic that was put on this website in 2012 and people were saying it looked genuine. The one on ebay looks very similar  through my eyes. What do you think ?

Attachments: No photo uploads here

The autograph you have shown I believe belonged to a gal named Charlotte who purchased it after MJ died, and somehow it was stolen from her (if this is the one I am remembering correctly).  She had asked what people thought, and I believe Wendy Christine was the only one who weighed in and she thought it might be good. 

I personally never liked that autograph and the reason why is because to me it looks almost too pretty and neat to be MJ.  But I could be wrong.  Its just my personal feeling on it.

I don't think yours looks the same, they look like they are from different hands.

-w

Thanks again
I really don't like it myself. Steve's right. The pic is too small. Plus, the "M" doesn't look right, and the spacing of the lettering in Jackson looks strange.
Hi James,thanks , I've posted a larger JPEG to steve (above)
Not an authentic Michael Jackson autograph in my opinion

JBS......Too funny bro!

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service