We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Michael Jackson Musée Grévin Autograph (1997)

Hello everybody,

Just get this autograph signed on april 19th 1997 in Musée Grévin in Paris.

So in love with it !

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 8, 2020 at 5:27pm

Do you have an independent opinion of this signature?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Miller on July 8, 2020 at 5:29pm

I’m a coin flip being honest. But in coin flips and music I trust Roger Epperson 100 out of 100 times personally. Get Beckett dual buy in and I’d accept that.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 8, 2020 at 5:31pm

There have been many occasions on this site where more than 1 expert are simply mistaken. I don't say here or not. But it is a true statement.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 8, 2020 at 5:40pm

That is an interesting statement. If taken literally there would be almost no reason to submit (I hate that word) for full exam. Quick Opinions carry much too much weight these days. Not with me.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on July 8, 2020 at 6:44pm

It wouldn’t be enough for me. The fact that Wascher believes that it isn’t authentic is a problem for this item regardless of what the others say.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 8, 2020 at 7:04pm

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Prashant Kaushik on July 8, 2020 at 8:02pm

BallroomDays67 your right! Wascher is truly one of the best MJ autograph experts out there. Even then when you have this many consensus of people saying it is not authentic, it will be very difficult to potentially sale the autograph down the line. However, if the original poster believes in its authentic and intends to keep it ultimately our opinions don't matter.

Nevertheless, the opinion of Wascher should not be underestimated. Truly a valued person in understanding MJs autograph.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on July 8, 2020 at 8:51pm

She does an amazing job with a tough signature. It shouldn’t be tough to sell though if it does get certed. The only thing you can do when someone feels that way is present a strong case that can’t be denied, and even then it might not make any difference.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 8, 2020 at 8:53pm

From what I have seen I don't think it is authentic. YMMV.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on July 9, 2020 at 9:39am

I agree with Ballroom, I would trust Wascher's opinion on MJ over anyone else.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 8, 2020 at 5:24pm

Also, TPG's can and do make mistakes - for example, fully 50% of the Jackie Gleason autographs shown at the relevant PSA Facts page are just secretarials by Patricia Saddlemen (my own discovery) - or forgeries of Saddleman secretarials. With my own specialty, Gleason, I would pit my opinion against anyone's without hesitation. I do not rely on external opinions for years. I've been collecting Gleason since 1978.