We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

Paul mc cartney, opinions?

Views: 434

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by FB on December 9, 2015 at 12:57pm

In my opinion, it looks like it was painted and not signed.  Plus, why would the top of the "L" in "Paul" be missing. If it was signed, there would have been an attempt of completing it. 

PLEASE, get MORE OPINIONS. Thanks!

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on December 9, 2015 at 4:28pm

I dont like anything about it

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 9, 2015 at 7:25pm

Aside from the smudging, this looks good to me.

Permalink Reply by Dave Stein on December 9, 2015 at 11:08pm

NO GOOD

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 10, 2015 at 9:38am
It's being offered by a reputable seller that has been around for many years and seems to take care to offer authentic Beatles material. I don't see a problem with it.
Permalink Reply by FB on December 10, 2015 at 11:13am

Who's the seller, if you don't mind me asking?

Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on December 10, 2015 at 12:31pm
Rockaway Records. I bought my vintage McCartney from them. Frank Caiazzo authenticated mine (he authenticates for them) When I bought mine it was listed that Frank looked at mine, this listing doesn't show Frank looked at it however.

I believe it is good, based on their reputation and it looks right to me being on a CD. I would be interested to see if Frank looked at it.
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on December 10, 2015 at 1:15pm

Rockaway is very reputable. But remember that the attractiveness of an autograph matters. And over time it's bound to matter more and more.

Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on December 10, 2015 at 1:18pm
I agree completely, I wouldn't buy it based on exactly what you are saying (as well as an actual album will be worth more then CD) For a little bit more you could find something nicer.
Permalink Reply by Robin Banks on December 12, 2015 at 5:41pm

Wayne Johnson is professional in all his dealings.  I trust him with any Beatles stuff.

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on December 10, 2015 at 12:29pm

It could be just fine but it's controversial and unattractive enough that I'd consider finding another. You want an autograph that will hold up to the test of time. If it's way under market to take into account what it looks like and from a top notch dealer that backs things up with a lifetime guarantee, you may want to buy it if you're limited in what you can spend. But get a QO from Roger or PSA on it.

Permalink Reply by Paul on December 10, 2015 at 12:50pm
If Caiazzo is writing it up, then you dont need to waste your money on a quick opinion.
Yes its a little controversial and it would be better to buy one that is a clear mac sig.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Groups

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service