Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by FB on December 9, 2015 at 12:57pm

In my opinion, it looks like it was painted and not signed.  Plus, why would the top of the "L" in "Paul" be missing. If it was signed, there would have been an attempt of completing it. 

PLEASE, get MORE OPINIONS. Thanks!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on December 9, 2015 at 4:28pm

I dont like anything about it

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 9, 2015 at 7:25pm

Aside from the smudging, this looks good to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dave Stein on December 9, 2015 at 11:08pm

NO GOOD

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 10, 2015 at 9:38am

It's being offered by a reputable seller that has been around for many years and seems to take care to offer authentic Beatles material. I don't see a problem with it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by FB on December 10, 2015 at 11:13am

Who's the seller, if you don't mind me asking?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on December 10, 2015 at 12:31pm

Rockaway Records. I bought my vintage McCartney from them. Frank Caiazzo authenticated mine (he authenticates for them) When I bought mine it was listed that Frank looked at mine, this listing doesn't show Frank looked at it however.

I believe it is good, based on their reputation and it looks right to me being on a CD. I would be interested to see if Frank looked at it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on December 10, 2015 at 1:15pm

Rockaway is very reputable. But remember that the attractiveness of an autograph matters. And over time it's bound to matter more and more.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on December 10, 2015 at 1:18pm

I agree completely, I wouldn't buy it based on exactly what you are saying (as well as an actual album will be worth more then CD) For a little bit more you could find something nicer.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Robin Banks on December 12, 2015 at 5:41pm

Wayne Johnson is professional in all his dealings.  I trust him with any Beatles stuff.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on December 10, 2015 at 12:29pm

It could be just fine but it's controversial and unattractive enough that I'd consider finding another. You want an autograph that will hold up to the test of time. If it's way under market to take into account what it looks like and from a top notch dealer that backs things up with a lifetime guarantee, you may want to buy it if you're limited in what you can spend. But get a QO from Roger or PSA on it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on December 10, 2015 at 12:50pm

If Caiazzo is writing it up, then you dont need to waste your money on a quick opinion.
Yes its a little controversial and it would be better to buy one that is a clear mac sig.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page