We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

Paul McCartney circa 1990 opinion? (Caiazzo)

I am curious on what everyone's thought is on this Paul McCartney autograph that is from circa 1990? (It has been cleared by Frank Caiazzo) however it seems off to me...

1 member likes this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by James on September 5, 2015 at 4:37pm

It does look a little off to me as well, although, as I have learned, a little off does not necessarily mean not genuine.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 5, 2015 at 6:39pm

it looks off to me too

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on September 5, 2015 at 7:01pm

Yeah, starting with the P to the A some times you look at a signature and your first impression is that it just looks "off" which is how I feel too. Though signed fast ,the shape of P just bugs me. One of my other hobbies is bird watching and I used to be a volunteer at a hawk watch in a state park. I was the guy that identified migrating hawks flying high in the sky. We had a thing that we called Gis ( short for general impression and shape) no nothing dirty and Im out of parenthesis! Not to mention the M and Cs. Anyway looks off to me too. Course after all this I could be wrong.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on September 5, 2015 at 7:02pm

It is being sold by Rockaway records. It says it comes with a Frank Caiazzo loa. Unless they know exactly where it was signed I don't know how Frank is comfortable saying this one is genuine. Then again, he has seen more graphs then me.