Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Beatleworld on November 14, 2016 at 11:12pm

In my opinion this one is no good.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on November 14, 2016 at 11:29pm

Thanks for the comments so far.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on November 15, 2016 at 2:07am

I am retracting my initial conclusion. On further looking there are parts to have concerning issues.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on November 15, 2016 at 1:29am

I don't like to give opinions on photos that are so small, but it's bold enough that I will. I think Beatleworld is right. I think that it probably is not genuine.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on November 15, 2016 at 5:56am

Looks not good in my opinion. There are so much genuine autographs of Ringo out there, so you should pass this one

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on November 15, 2016 at 11:02am

Thanks for the advice, bought it as it's from a friend who has obtained a few nice ones for me. Comes with good provenance.

It's all about opinions!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 15, 2016 at 11:06am

Could you possibly post a better pic?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on November 15, 2016 at 11:18am

Another pic

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• IMG_1397.jpg, 131 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Beatleworld on November 15, 2016 at 11:32am

Still a bad fake

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on November 15, 2016 at 11:33am

Thanks for the comments

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Thorsten Knublauch on November 16, 2016 at 4:58am

Very rushed and could be authentic - i have seen several like this - but if you have a discussion like this here it is better to stay away. Those short Ringo and Pauls are not worth it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on November 16, 2016 at 8:38am

If it's authentic, than it's a very rushed example

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page