We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.
Authenticity is Everything
Signed Please Please Me
What do you guys think about this set? On the back of Please Please Me, and supposedly signed 12th September.
The one thing that stands out is the Lennon, which I think looks a bit odd. Which brings in to question the other signatures.
Paul and Ringo are a little hard to see.
Any opinions on this set?
Thanks
Lewis
- Attachments: No photo uploads here
-
-
01-george.jpg, 269 KB -
02-john.jpg, 256 KB
-
03-paul.jpg, 269 KB
-
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Lewis Reynolds on
-
Ringo attached
- Attachments: No photo uploads here
-
-
04-ringo.jpg, 274 KB
-
-
Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on
-
For me, all the signatures looks too fresh. George's G immediately looks wrong. John's J is off as I have never seen it that way before. McCartney looks bad from what I can see and Ringo doesn't even look close.
-
-
Now saying all this surely someone will say I'm wrong ;)
-
Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on
-
these are horrible, imo
-
Permalink Reply by Tony Bonich on
-
All that bad!!! Anybody can see that
-
-
sorry for posting it! lol
-
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on
-
They look fine to me for ones signed 12th September. 2014.
-
-
Haha!
-
-
Where did you find it?
-
-
A UK auction house.
-
Permalink Reply by Full Time Flipper on
-
i dont collect beatles but i see plenty someone has tried too hard with the angles on that John Lennon.. way too sharp,these auction houses are getting way too sloppy or greedy usually fakes like this are passed around auction houses and rebuffed until one accepts it into the sale sometimes they accept them simply because they have a COA, if this was on e bay it would be removed
-
Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on
-
Someone needs to perfect their Beatles signatures a little more...
Photos
Videos
Groups
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
