We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

I have been collecting Star Wars autographs since 1998.  Not all of my signatures are on Star Wars memorabilia.  For example, when I met Warwick Davis at a comic convention in New York City, I had him sign a Willow photograph.  I also have publicity photos of Sir Alec Guinness and Christopher Lee from the 1970s, and a Natalie Portman signed The Diary of Anne Frank theater poster from her performance on Broadway back in 1998.  My current wish list includes Peter Cushing, Terence Stamp and John Williams.  I am interested in knowing about the collections and wish lists of other members.

Views: 88395

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Damn I'm good haha. 

I guess I just wasn't a major fan of the original trilogy, except for ROTJ. As I say, ESB and ANH were not bad films, just a tad underwhelming for me.

The prequels for me get a really bad reputation. TPM had one of the best saber fights and villains in Darth Maul. AOTC was a bit less successful in my opinion but Christopher Lee is a great villain and the film was enjoyable, if slightly lacking.

Sith I put after Clones because I enjoyed Clones more as I felt Sith was just a bit of a well intentioned mess but nevertheless, I did enjoy all the prequels - I think its fair to say the prequels, it could be argued in places, was a missed opportunity but I did enjoy them more than some of the films in the original trilogy. 

Nevertheless, I enjoyed all the SW films. Can't wait for Episode VIII. Be interesting to see what mysteries get solved. 

May the force be with you too, Mike

I enjoyed TFA more on my 2nd viewing but overall, I found it a bit of an anti-climax in truth - I'm with Pete, I don't think utilising old ideas was a good way forward. 

I think they should have constructed a brand new story -- that said, it did have some interesting bits and General Snoke was a good villain - Ren also was no Darth Vader and the ending with the saber battles was a letdown.

Don't get me wrong, despite the criticisms, it was still a fun movie - just not vintage. 

Snoke was a good villain?

Snoke was the love child of Voldemort and Gollum. 

I didn't get Snoke at all. Just one more CG character that's un-relatable.

Don't forget at this stage he was a hologram - we might be able to relate to Snoke more as time goes on. 

He seemed to have a more subtle edge to him than the emperor did - the emperor was evil but flawed - we will have to see how Snoke pans out.

I must admit I thought Lord Of The Rings when I saw Snoke but I never considered Harry Potter.

We might learn some more about Snoke in the later films - he came over as being a bit more subtle evil than Palpatine.

Speaking of love child.....
Attachments: No photo uploads here

lol

Nice

Pete, did you give your review of the movie in Rebelscum? I didnt see it in the reviews thread unless you've changed your name.

That is funny Bradford.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service