We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Steve asked me to start a new thread since some were having a lot of issues with regards to whether or not the through the mail autographs of Jerry Lee Lewis are real or not.  I will post some examples of what we have been getting recently and some know in person examples.   These TTM signatures are not cheap.  You have to pay $50 for them to his box office box.  The question is are they real or not.  Roger has said that he has never seen Mr. Lewis sign this way and it looks to perfect - like a woman's signature.  

Please post your thoughts here and examples.

thanks

Mark

Views: 61865

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Ballroom,

Pulling writing from an image in Photoshop is done by selecting the image from the inside of the writing to where it meets the background. Then it's cleaned up by hand and a smoothing tool. If there were similar streaky areas in the autograph, they would pull out similarly, but they wouldn't create new ones. What you find most often are edges that don't pull out cleanly from the background, because the pixels on the edge are too close to the color of the background ones.

I pulled the autograph from Mark Peterson's photo using the Magic Wand tool at a tolerance of 32. Here it is:

This sounds reasonable. What do you think the answer is for the matching signatures?

Mark Peterson's would probably have to be inspected in person to know for sure, Chad. We could start with very high resolution, sharp scans of his piece and one of the reproduction CDs. That may tell us what we need to know.

Mark sent his LP to the mailing address and it came back signed to him. He also received a signed photo. He posted a pic of the signed LP here for opinions after which the CD appeared with a repro of the signature and inscription on the cover.

What is your opinion on the autograph itself Steve??  Authentic or not?

Mark

From what I've gleaned from these discussions, Mark, I doubt that JLL signed it. But that's not the most interesting thing here. It's why would they take the signature from Mark's piece, even from a high-quality, high-resolution image, and remove his signature and crop out the background?

Or were they both made the same way - by some sort of printing like an autopen type machine? 

Michael Jackson autopen sigs often had To (insert name here) and then the autopen sig.  The inscription can change and still have the original signature?

So its the exact same sig on the CD and Mark Peterson's TTM?  Does that make it an autopen?

No its not an auto pen, or that's what I think.  

My point was why would they put a "secretarial" signature on a legitimate released CD?? 

That is my question.  I find it very odd at most… but then again, look at the book signing mess. 

Mark

They sure look exactly the same (like an autopen would be) except for the inscription of course.  More confusion in the JLL saga.

They are the same.  Ballroom said that they used the signature from the LP for the CD and just took off the "To Mark".  If I understood him correctly.

Mark

OK I see now.  Strange indeed lol.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service