Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 29, 2016 at 2:32pm

Not authentic, in my opinion. The signatures appear consistent with what you would find at Antiquities and the like. The postcard and handbill for these shows are relatively inexpensive.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by marc e on November 29, 2016 at 2:35pm

its an actualy first printing poster .

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 29, 2016 at 2:46pm

That would be more expensive, but it isn't the first time I've seen that done.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by marc e on November 29, 2016 at 2:49pm

i have more back round aboout it but want  to here some more opinions , maybe roger or other people thanks

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 29, 2016 at 3:06pm

No problem. Roger would give you an accurate opinion of these signatures.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on November 29, 2016 at 3:19pm

I agree with Ballroom that these are not genuine.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JackGotLucky on November 29, 2016 at 5:31pm

These are without question not authentic. Sorry.              Jack...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on November 29, 2016 at 6:11pm

I agree with the boyZ.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on November 29, 2016 at 8:19pm

Definitly no good.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Josh Board on November 29, 2016 at 11:55pm

The Doors are my favorite band. I also consider myself an expert in the field of autographs and....this doesn't look good to me.

Jim NEVER signed that perfectly.

Ray is a bit off, but it's the Robby that's the worst, and he's an easy forge, as he often signed so sloppy. I think Ray and Robby look like they're signed in the same hand, too.

John is bad, but the Densmore in his last name looks nice.

Not authentic.

• ▶ Reply