We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Authenticity is Everything
Three different Paul McCartneys - opinions please?
Greetings, all.
I have been a collector for 20+ years, and a Beatles fan for 30+. I have thousands of autographs, and all the while, the one that has eluded me is Sir Paul. I have tried in person, and even tried by mail back when I was a kid umpteen years ago. Having a genuine autograph would truly mean a lot to me.
I have three possible examples that I would love some help with. They are all supposedly from book signings he did. Please help me out. I would really appreciate some knowledgeable opinions on all three.
Thanks much, and best to all,
Tom
Tags: beatles
- Attachments: No photo uploads here
-
-
mccartney1.jpg, 25 KB -
McCartney-2.jpg, 59 KB
-
mccartneybook.jpg, 27 KB
-
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Beatleworld on
-
I still think all 3 are no good.
-
Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on
-
what do you think of this one?
and this one?
-
-
On first look....Both of these look ok.
-
-
yes, they are. and you are very good with Paul McC signatures. I am normally very very cautious of Macca signatures, but I see similarities between the Yesterday sheet and the first signature. The second one in the discussion looks spot on to me. The third one is a little quirky, but so is the second one I posted. but i still see positives in the third one.
I am finding that Macca signatures, because of the endless variations, are almost impossible to authenticate. But I would not rule out any of these at this point.
-
-
Ok. Everyone's entitled to their own opinion, that's why this site is so good, on the 2nd one, there is a break between the a and u in Paul, this couldn't possibly be done by Paul, the 3rd is the easiest to tell.....however I totally agree, Pauls recent sigs are very hard to tell, there are tons of these "clouds" books that turn up regularly on eBay, they are almost all crap !
-
-
agreed!
-
-
look closely, its not a break. I thought the same thing but I magnified it. its his typical ccw "loop" that sometimes is connected to the P. but its not a break. the rest of the signature, with the angles and spacing, looks good to me. I do understand 1 and 3 being questionable.
-
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on
-
Terrier, of the two you posted, I don't trust the Yesterday.
-
Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on
-
That one comes with a Caiazzo loa.
http://m.ebay.com/itm/Paul-McCartney-THE-BEATLES-Signed-Autograph-Y...
-
-
Well then I'm probably wrong. Frank's the best.
-
-
I don't think it is bad to question any autograph, no matter who authenticated it. I do agree however Caiazzo is the best.
-
-
one is Caiazzo, the other is Perry. I posted them just to show that there are quirky examples that have been authenticated by these highly regarded Beatles experts.
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
Blog Posts
Gold & Pawn Trading Center Sells Forged Mickey Mantle Photo COA GFA
Posted by CJCollector on November 27, 2024 at 2:23pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Ebay Seller Smpsportscards Sells Forged Counterfeit Willie Mays 1996-97 Topps Autograph Card
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
COA CSA Authentic Forged Babe Ruth Cut Autograph Laughable
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
Photos
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
