Urgent ! Rolling Stones Opinions Please its so the Seller says from 1965 in Person

i think it looks not good ........................Thanxxx for Help !

Views: 263

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Autographcontrol on July 14, 2018 at 7:19am

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on July 14, 2018 at 8:01am

Certainly not ‘65 signatures! 

The Charlie Watts seems ok, but the Jagger is not real at all.

I would leave this well alone!

Permalink Reply by Autographcontrol on July 14, 2018 at 8:03am

This was my first thought................Thanks for that...........I think the Chalry is signed with a Uniball, but in the 2000 Area...earliest....

Permalink Reply by Classic Rock on July 14, 2018 at 8:08am

I don’t like the Jagger. 

Permalink Reply by Steve on July 14, 2018 at 9:09pm

The Jagger is no good, plus they didn't have sharpie markers in the 60's.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service