We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Urgent ! Rolling Stones Opinions Please its so the Seller says from 1965 in Person

i think it looks not good ........................Thanxxx for Help !

Views: 261

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Certainly not ‘65 signatures! 

The Charlie Watts seems ok, but the Jagger is not real at all.

I would leave this well alone!

This was my first thought................Thanks for that...........I think the Chalry is signed with a Uniball, but in the 2000 Area...earliest....

I don’t like the Jagger. 

The Jagger is no good, plus they didn't have sharpie markers in the 60's.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service