What do you make of this 1961 signed Judy Garland color image? JSA LOA sicker on card.

All opinions most welcome!

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on October 28, 2024 at 9:24am

Thank you.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Doug James on October 28, 2024 at 9:34am

Of the Big Three, JSA is the worst by far. Particularly on Music and Entertainment. I don’t know Garland but I’d keep that in mind.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on October 28, 2024 at 9:36am

I only the mentioned the papers. They mean nothing to me. It appears a fine ballpoint 1961 signature

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by AustinCollector on October 28, 2024 at 9:58am

Who told you that?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Doug James on October 28, 2024 at 12:42pm

My 30+ years of dealing with Jimmy Spence going back to when he was a one man show in Orwigsburg.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by eddy on October 28, 2024 at 11:40am

For comparison:

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on October 28, 2024 at 11:43am

Your conclusion please?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Doug James on October 28, 2024 at 12:29pm

I’ll be interested to hear his thoughts. They don’t look remotely the same to me.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on October 28, 2024 at 12:36pm

How so?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by eddy on October 28, 2024 at 12:37pm

I was just looking at a program signed in 1961 and a couple of contract signatures from that year. I've just found that she's one that you've got to be cautious with because of her continued desirability.

I wouldn't recommend the OP. It's achingly drawn to my eyes. The ink itself looks a bit odd to me as well. With respect, I'd agree with Doug's point that a letter from JSA shouldn't be a determinate here.