We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

What do you make of this 1961 signed Judy Garland color image? JSA LOA sicker on card.

All opinions most welcome!

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on October 28, 2024 at 9:24am

Thank you.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Doug James on October 28, 2024 at 9:34am

Of the Big Three, JSA is the worst by far. Particularly on Music and Entertainment. I don’t know Garland but I’d keep that in mind.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on October 28, 2024 at 9:36am

I only the mentioned the papers. They mean nothing to me. It appears a fine ballpoint 1961 signature

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by AustinCollector on October 28, 2024 at 9:58am

Who told you that?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Doug James on October 28, 2024 at 12:42pm

My 30+ years of dealing with Jimmy Spence going back to when he was a one man show in Orwigsburg.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eddy on October 28, 2024 at 11:40am

For comparison:

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on October 28, 2024 at 11:43am

Your conclusion please?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Doug James on October 28, 2024 at 12:29pm

I’ll be interested to hear his thoughts. They don’t look remotely the same to me.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on October 28, 2024 at 12:36pm

How so?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eddy on October 28, 2024 at 12:37pm

I was just looking at a program signed in 1961 and a couple of contract signatures from that year. I've just found that she's one that you've got to be cautious with because of her continued desirability.

I wouldn't recommend the OP. It's achingly drawn to my eyes. The ink itself looks a bit odd to me as well. With respect, I'd agree with Doug's point that a letter from JSA shouldn't be a determinate here.