Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Mike Shepherd on August 11, 2013 at 1:07pm

How did you come upon this piece Charles?  Did you attain it in person?  If so it is obviously authentic and a great conversation piece as well but if somebody is trying to sell it to you they have a lot of nerve.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tyler Gray on August 11, 2013 at 1:14pm

He's almost always had a terrible "signature" if you want to even call it that. I honestly could believe that this was real, however, would have zero interest in wanting it. Looks like a little kid just got ahold of a sharpie and streaked across it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on August 11, 2013 at 1:18pm

Again, this is why Pacino is on my list of autographs I just don't want.  At all.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Zarelli on August 11, 2013 at 2:47pm

Ditto.

As much as I enjoy him as an actor, I have no desire to obtain an autograph like this. Zero display value and an insult to the recipient.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on August 11, 2013 at 2:56pm

The awful photo is defaced.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Charles O'Brailey on August 11, 2013 at 6:00pm

His autographs have gotten worse over the years.  Earlier autographs from wayyyyyyyyyyyy earlier in his career is desirable but anything now looks like garbage.  Look at this other one.  WOW.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike P on August 11, 2013 at 6:04pm

hey- if you have a spare $400 lying around you can have a full signed one from the private signing he did....lol..

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike P on August 12, 2013 at 12:07pm

haha!  

I think for $400 you get him to keep the pen on the paper for about 2 seconds longer

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike Shepherd on August 15, 2013 at 2:39pm

At least you are able to recognize the "Al Pc" along with a stray dot.  All kidding aside, I would have no problem spending the extra money for a current Al Pacino autograph that even slightly resembles his earlier autographs.

• ▶ Reply