We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

Calling all John F Kennedy Experts - what do you think of this?

 

OK, I can’t believe I am already doing this all over again, but now instead of John Wayne it is John Kennedy. 

I am hoping for some of the great objective expertise from the John Wayne study I posted a couple weeks ago.  Anyway, here is the JFK case study.  Refer to the letter and close up signature below.

 

 

In 1965 Charles Hamilton wrote the most extensive case study ever produced for John Kennedy’s genuine, autopen and secretarial signatures, “The Robot that Helped to Make a President”.  
Now using Hamilton’s analysis and the letters below I have conclude this is a genuine JFK signed letter for the following reasons.

1). Hamilton concluded JFK did not start to depend on secretarials until after 1953.
2). The first known documented secretarial was 1952 (secretary IV page 31 of Hamilton's book). This letter is 1951
3). None of the secretarials on pages 22-31 are a match for this letter signature
4). Robot was first seen in 1958
5). The signature is a match as Authentic  . see pages 45-46
6). Kennedy’s secretaries may appear skilled but they all made glaring mistakes somewhere within their “work”.
 - Note the secretarial “J”’s are over flamboyant with High hoods and crossovers compared to his genuine during this time period (1951)
 - The “ohn” is way out of whack in height and width compared to his genuine where “ohn” is always lower then the “J”.
 -  The “K” often throughout his later life was a circular loop like here, see pages 41, 50,
 - The break after the last “n” is quite consistent during the early 50’s. The secretaries really screwed that up consistently , see page 31.
 - During the early 50’s his genuine examples still displayed a recognizable “e" after the last n.  Then the “d” would look like the first part of the “y” which it actually wasn’t.  The “y” would just drop off very low after the “d”.  See page 46.

  - ** NOTE: Key indicator - watch the Transition from the 1950 genuine example to the 1952 example in the first Hamilton "Genuine" example image below.  Note how the "d" in Kennedy was more pronounced as he came off 1950-51, then began to dissolve into 1952-53.

 There are several other variables, but didn't want to ramble on forever.

What do you guys think?

Views: 10892

Comment by kevin conway on January 11, 2011 at 11:09am

Ok, here we go. See the five PSA Certified JFK Letters from period 1949-1952. when the letter of reference above was signed. And the finale, the May 24, 1951 PSA Certified Letter, signed 14 days after my letter. If anyone does not see this as dead match (including the elusive "y") , I'll eat my laptop, and the table it sits on.

And, here it is the May 24 1951 PSA Letter


Comment by kevin conway on January 11, 2011 at 11:11am

Opps, here are the other which didn't post below:

Comment by kevin conway on January 11, 2011 at 11:16am

John ,

NO need for apology.  I appreciate your help already given. I am having fun doing this, not to mention an amazing education.   I am just a bit obsessed with confirming authenticity when I feel strongly about it.   Maybe I spend too much time on it...;}    But when I sell such an item to a client I want them to now I do my homework.

Comment by kevin conway on January 11, 2011 at 12:06pm

 

It seems the reason these early signatures are so elusive is because JFK letters in the 1949-1951 time period are relatively scarce and hence the examples don't appear on the market often.  Out of about 40-50 PSA letters I just viewed only two were in that time period. The majority are late 50's/early 60's.

Comment by john reznikoff on January 11, 2011 at 4:57pm
Very close. Enough for me to raise to a 7! Well done.
Comment by kevin conway on January 11, 2011 at 5:33pm

So here is the dilemma. My client brought the letter to PSA to the SportMemorabilia show in San Jose this past weekend and whoever the sports authenticatorwas said “probably secretarial”.

 

I won’t go into what I think about the speedy  “drive-thru” PSA setups at Sport Memorabilia Shows, will take that up in the PSA Discussion (BTW I believe in 3rd party).    But, of course because of the 10 minute PSA “Show Analysis” deeming it “probably secretarial” PSA unfortunately doesn’t do the “right thing” and opt out of opinion. Instead, they charge the $100 and fail it based on most likely a guess by someone evidently with not a high level of Non-sports (i.e. historical) expertise.  And, I have to issue a refund because all my client knows is it failed PSA.    I am sure some of you have beenin this position?  Any ideas?

Comment by john reznikoff on January 11, 2011 at 6:57pm
I have been in that position and am sympathetic. As I have said before, I have no special treatment, rubber stamps, or magic wand of any kind at PSA....but .....print out this blog and send it with a letter to PSA. Also, attach a scan to my personal email and I will opine on your behalf and you can forward to whoever at PSA looks at these things. Perhaps they will reverse.
Comment by kevin conway on January 11, 2011 at 7:31pm
It's the third time this has happened in past couple years.  Maybe in our lifetime we will see a more consistent and higher grade process.  Thanks John.
Comment by kevin conway on January 11, 2011 at 7:55pm

Travis,

I've been waiting for you.   I have stated several times (and have written a number of articles) that I believe 3rd party authen5ticaiton is needed, even if I am a vicitm of some of the obvious flaws of the process.   

 

In this scenario however, I am in 100% agreement with you about the "Sport Show" temp setup, for exactly the reasons you have cited.  I actually cringe when I go to a show here in Boston (the Big Willmington for example) and watch JSA or PSA accepting autographs like a hamburger concession stand.  I think I even hear them often ask  "do you want to Biggie Size that?" .  

But, a major flaw in the business of authentication and ammunition (and unfortunately valid)  for the PSA/JSA bashers.

 

Travis it reminds me of when I was in Navy Boot camp.   Because they simulated at war scenarios all the time I remember we all had to get our wisdom teeth removed in a makeshift dental office.  So instead of going to a competent dentist, in a clean office with all the equipment and skilled personnel, we stood in like an assembly line, waited our turn, sat in a chair, shot our mouths with Novocaine and two very young dental technicians (NOT Dentists) reached in with pliers and began twisting and turning my wisdom teeth, and then dropped one down my throat.  The other kid (we were all about 18-19) grabs my throats and says don't swallow. The other guy then takes a pair of needle noise pliers and goes deep into my windpipe and pulls out the tooth.  I was lucky, the next guy in back of me, they slipped and sliced his lip open and needed about 5 stitches.    Since then I've had a very low tolerance for sub par competence or "cutting corners".

Comment by kevin conway on January 11, 2011 at 8:06pm

Travis,

Re: "If people insist on getting an opinion on their piece at a show, what they need to start doing is going to the counter and saying "I intend to submit this Kennedy signature, and I would like to know who behind that curtain will see this piece and what are his or her qualifications for opining on such a signature""


Funny you say that.  When my client said he was bringing this to a Sport Show the RED FLAG went up. So I specifically modified my COA, below.  However, of course when he brought that message to the show they ignored his request.  Below is the exact paragraph I added to the COA to address the potentially inept sport show authenticaiton process.

"Thank you for visiting our web site.  We appreciate having you as a customer ofextraordinary historical memorabilia. This is great piece of history.  A genuine John Kennedy signed letter as Congressmanof Massachusetts. .    We have collected and studied his signature for over 25 years and guarantee this is HIS Genuine signature and not that of a secretary or autopen machine.  If you have this PSA’d or JSA’d  I highly suggest you request an Experienced historical authenticator that is well versed with Charles Hamilton’s JFK Signature study“A Robot that Made a President” "



Comment

You need to be a member of Autograph Live to add comments!

Join Autograph Live

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service