Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Michael Kasmar-AutographPros.com on April 22, 2017 at 11:39am

If this was signed in Dallas there should be Hamill's sticker on it.  Please ask to see that and if not then the provenance makes no sense.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike Navarro on April 22, 2017 at 11:13pm

It 100% was not signed in Dallas at the most recent Hamill signing because the Beckett letter is dated early March and the event did not take place until March 31 to April 2

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on April 22, 2017 at 1:51pm

And we still haven't seen the Beckett sticker/letter. With that sig ya need it!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on April 22, 2017 at 1:55pm

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on April 22, 2017 at 1:55pm

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on April 22, 2017 at 7:19pm

Thanks Rich.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jason Strecker on April 24, 2017 at 1:00pm

Wasn't Mark responding to people on twitter asking him if he really signed an item they posted in question...?

Would be interesting to see his thoughts on this one.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TAMoore on May 26, 2017 at 7:23pm

He approved it!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on May 26, 2017 at 7:30pm

Yeah,seems like that's the way he signed them, they weren't easy to sign so that's what people got.Ive seen a few including the ones shown here. Still not pleasing to the eye.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page