We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Ronnie Hawkins and The Hawks (The Band)

Hey guys,

I recently bought this and was wondering what the experts think. I didn’t pay much for it, but I’m a big band fan.

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 5, 2017 at 12:21pm

James Cagney for $12.50. ZZ Top photo signed by all three for $28. Harry Chapin for $18.75.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jason young on December 5, 2017 at 2:41pm

Who wants bo didly? I wouldn't pay 5 bucks lol

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jason young on December 5, 2017 at 2:49pm

No Dudley will be a worthless scrap of paper as the old generation dies bad ivestment...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 5, 2017 at 11:56am

Here's another Ronnie Hawkins from the sale seller:

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jason young on December 5, 2017 at 2:39pm

This ink looks super new on this hmm now again I'm not trusting it...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 5, 2017 at 3:06pm

Diddley and Harry Chapin signatures should be above $175 or so, no?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 5, 2017 at 3:15pm

Allow me to quote Ralph Kramden. Aha! AHA!

Check these out...I knew I saw the source before!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 5, 2017 at 3:23pm

More...

And another...I would not drink from this well if I were dying of dehydration.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 5, 2017 at 5:33pm

One more "gleason" from this source...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 6, 2017 at 10:30am

Yes, all of those "gleason's" are bad, and all come from the same source as the item in question over the last year and a half. Next is to match the hand in pen and pencil (sigs and dates) on all these album pages. When shown scans of all these "gleason"s" and asked "just how many" he has, source says "I don't know". The chances of a single source having so many extremely rare "gleason's", some made out of the same vintage date book and dedicated to the same person...well, perhaps it doesn't matter because that is certainly not "gleason's" hand. You can see read about these in my "Authentic Gleason" thread. I'd avoid this source as has been mentioned.