Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Gregory on August 22, 2018 at 4:29pm

Hi Donna,

In my opinion, this is not authentic.  It looks secretarial, unfortunately.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by goodcat on August 22, 2018 at 4:30pm

It looks reasonable

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on August 22, 2018 at 4:48pm

secretarial

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by goodcat on August 22, 2018 at 5:02pm

Secretarial really?

Odd because it's pretty darn close to his book signing that I can see

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by goodcat on August 22, 2018 at 5:02pm

Secretarial really?

Odd because it's pretty darn close to his book signing that I can see

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on August 22, 2018 at 6:01pm

Hi Donna,

Here is a link to an Eastwood signature study here at AML:

Eastwood Study

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by goodcat on August 22, 2018 at 6:29pm

Nice post Eric

At a quickie look at your link and others I've seen the OP sig does have an unusual large top and long loop in the "E"

But the "d" is somewhere between authentic and secretarial but leans more to authentic IMO

This is rather an atypical one to me

What is your opinion Eric? An easy choice or not? 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on August 22, 2018 at 6:51pm

Hi Shawn,

a little too stressed to say - that's why I linked. It looks...very legible and open.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by goodcat on August 22, 2018 at 6:58pm

Try to relax my friend 

Nothing pressing going on here 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on August 22, 2018 at 7:06pm

Thanks GC, wish the same were true here! 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Donna M Marshall on August 22, 2018 at 9:03pm

so its up in the air on this one...lol. Thats ok I have another one to check but need to dig it out... thank you to all posting their opinions I really do appreciate it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on August 22, 2018 at 9:14pm

JMO, I believe this is a secretarial.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page