Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Beatleworld on August 14, 2019 at 11:58am

Perry is a Beatles seller, he will sell your items for you, however he’s not a Beatles autograph expert, he’ll be the first to admit that, Both these items are fake, I don’t think Frank would write a letter for either of them. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on August 14, 2019 at 12:00pm

Thank you, Beatleworld.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on August 14, 2019 at 12:27pm

Perry isn't a Beatles autograph expert? And he will admit that? Very interesting. How come a person who admits he is not a Beatles autograph expert issues letters of authenticity? How come his COA has become one of the best guarantee in the field of Beatles autographs? 
Anoter issue: I guess some may have doubts regarding this Ringo autograph (it looks like the one in the original post on the Ringo Rama cd), however Frank authenticated it and issued a letter for it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on August 14, 2019 at 12:28pm

Here is Frank's letter:

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on August 14, 2019 at 1:20pm

No comment here from me on this discussion, other than questioning whether Perry is a "Beatles Autograph Expert", I would say anyone rendering an opinion may make mistakes...obviously...Especially when you take in account how long ANY authenticator does the job. 

That being said, Perry's loa defines the amount of time he has been authenticating and studying Beatles autographs (27 years)...So I think it is safe to say he is as much an "expert" and a respected opinion in The Beatles autograph community. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on August 15, 2019 at 10:16pm

In his COAs Perry writes and I quote:
"In my opinion, the above described autographed item is authentic and genuine. I base this opinion on over 30 years experience in the study and examination of the Beatles and other pop culture autographs"
Now, do you still think that Perry will be the first to admit he's not a Beatles autograph expert???

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on August 14, 2019 at 12:19pm

Here's a nice example that is claimed to have been signed on the same date as the one in the OP:

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on August 14, 2019 at 3:33pm

Here's another example like the one in the OP:

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Beatleworld on August 14, 2019 at 4:51pm

When it comes to Beatles autographs I would rate only Frank Caiazzo as an expert, there are a few others that are good but no one is on the same page as him....obviously, this is in my opinion. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on August 14, 2019 at 8:45pm

Frank also authenticated and issued a letter for the Ringo autograph in the original post. Here it is. Could it be that Frank is mistaken for such a simple signature?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on August 14, 2019 at 9:00pm

According to the provenance, the top example posted above was signed on March 25, 2003. How do you think it compares to the one in question?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on August 14, 2019 at 10:45pm

Hard for me to say. I don't know. What do you think about all this? On the one hand atypical signatures of Ringo, and on the other there are letters by Frank. Do you think Frank is wrong?

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• …
• 43
• Next ›
• Page