Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by beardog1 on October 28, 2021 at 9:15am

bump - Any opinions are appreciated.  Thank you.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by beardog1 on November 5, 2021 at 11:26am

bump - Doubtful but hopeful.  Thanks for taking a look.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eddy on November 5, 2021 at 2:05pm

beardog - I'm afraid you are correct.  The blue sheet doesn't look quite right.  The "D" is atypical and the shape of the "l"s look like they have been switched.  A nitpick, but Dooley that I've seen usually had a taller "l" in his first name and a more squat and fatter "l" in his surname.  Agree about the "o"s as well.

I just don't see a fluidity in the blue example.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by beardog1 on November 5, 2021 at 4:06pm

Thank you, Etienne.  Although I am disappointed, I feel better having my conclusion this was not authentic confirmed by someone with more experience.  I continue to learn from members like you in this forum.  Thank you for sharing your experience, knowledge and opinions.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eddy on November 5, 2021 at 4:39pm

You're welcome, beardog.  You actually seem to have a good eye as well for nuances in handwriting.  I know it's disappointing but if it's any consolation we have all been there!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by beardog1 on November 5, 2021 at 9:52pm

Thank you, Etienne.  I have learned a lot from members on this forum including tips and tricks for comparing signatures, considering context of what was signed, etc.  I am in awe of those who know specific signatures so well that they can specify a date for an authentic signature or name a secretary of forger if not authentic.  I so appreciate members like you who take the time to help all of us enjoy this hobby and perhaps even get a little better at it.

• ▶ Reply